Wife entitled to get maintenance even when a Compromise of Lump Sum Alimony already has been executed.

Wife entitled to get maintenance even when a Compromise of Lump Sum Alimony already has been executed. The Punjab and Haryana High Court on dated 23.1.2022 held that filing a petition U/s 125 of Cr.P.C after a time gap of 13 years from the time of receiving alimony in lump sum, was not a misuse […]

Continue Reading

Shiv Kumar Verma and Another vs State Of U.P. and 3 Others

Any person who is under illegal detention by an officer of the State Government shall be paid compensation by the State  Government. Facts Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that there was some dispute relating to ancestral property between the petitioners and their family members. Some tiff arose between the petitioners and […]

Continue Reading

Section 91 of the Cr.P.C is not applicable to preliminary enquiry(Rajeshwar Sharma vs state of Chattisgarh).

Section 91 of the CrPC is not applicable to the preliminary inquiry before registration of the first information report under Section 154 of the CrPC. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (Cr.) No.678 of 2020 Order reserved on: 9-4-2021 Order delivered on: 7-6-2021 Rajeshwar Sharma, S/o Late Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, Aged about 60 […]

Continue Reading

Palghar Lynching Case Bail Granted to 89 accused: “Justice is blind and, at times, deaf.”

Palghar Lynching Case Bail Granted to 89 accused: “Justice is blind and, at times, deaf.” In the Palghar Lynching case, Thane Sessions Court held – Bail is a rule and jail is an exception. The Thane Sessions Court ‘Additional Sessions Judge SB Bahalkar’ grants bail to 89 accused in Palghar lynching case. The Court also […]

Continue Reading

Supreme Court to Khaap Members: Punishment for doing Love to someone is a worse form of Crime.

Supreme Court to Khaap Members: Punishment for doing Love to someone is a worse form of Crime. Recently, the Supreme Court has made a strong comment about a 30-year old honor killing case. The Supreme Court on 05/01/2021 heard an honor killing case. The court said in this hearing that no person can be punished […]

Continue Reading

Advocates acting professionally as per instructions of clients cannot be made liable for Defamation under IPC

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.Nos.4669 & 5115 of 2020 and Crl.MP.Nos.2915 & 2661 of 2020 Crl.OP.No.4669 of 2020 Madras High Court: Advocates acting professionally as per instructions of clients cannot be made liable for Defamation U/s 500 IPC  Para from judgment, a lawyer is an advocate, one who speaks for another. Naturally beyond what […]

Continue Reading

Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha, (2011) 1 SCC 14

Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha, (2011) 1 SCC 14 Right To Maintenance Under Section 125 Of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 “Where partners lived together for a long spell as husband and wife, a presumption would arise in favour of valid wedlock” Facts of the case : The Sarju Singh Kushwaha had two sons, Ram […]

Continue Reading

Amit Rao Patil vs. state of Maharashtra bail application no. 1813 of 2020 Rape is just not a forcible intercourse, it means to inhabit and destroy everything, Bombay High Court

  Amit Rao Patil vs. state of Maharashtra bail application no. 1813 of 2020 Rape is just not a forcible intercourse, it means to inhabit and destroy everything, Bombay high court  “Consent induced by fiduciary relationship not a free consent”: Bail petition dismissed by the Bombay HC to rape accused business partner of victim’s father […]

Continue Reading

SMT NILABATI BEHERA ALIAS LALITA BEHERA V STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS, AIR 1993 SC 1960

The Landmark judgement of Supreme court of India which changed the course of custodial deaths in India. Title Of the case: SMT NILABATI BEHERA ALIAS LALITA BEHERA V STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS, AIR 1993 SC 1960 Bench: Justice Jagdish Sharan Verma, Justice A.S. Anand, Justice, N. Venkatachala Court: Supreme Court of India Judgment: 24th […]

Continue Reading

Shri D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs State Of West Bengal, State Of U.P on 18 December 1996

Shri D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs State Of West Bengal, State Of U.P on 18 December 1996 SHRI D.K. BASU, ASHOK K. JOHRI                                                   …. PETITIONER                 Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL, STATE OF U.P                                 …….. RESPONDENT DATE OF JUDGMENT:     18/12/1996 BENCH: KULDIP SINGH, A.S. ANAND JUDGMENT: WITH WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 592 OF 1987 […]

Continue Reading