Supreme Court to Khaap Members: Punishment for doing Love to someone is a worse form of Crime.

Supreme Court to Khaap Members: Punishment for doing Love to someone is a worse form of Crime. Recently, the Supreme Court has made a strong comment about a 30-year old honor killing case. The Supreme Court on 05/01/2021 heard an honor killing case. The court said in this hearing that no person can be punished […]

Continue Reading

Advocates acting professionally as per instructions of clients cannot be made liable for Defamation under IPC

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.Nos.4669 & 5115 of 2020 and Crl.MP.Nos.2915 & 2661 of 2020 Crl.OP.No.4669 of 2020 Madras High Court: Advocates acting professionally as per instructions of clients cannot be made liable for Defamation U/s 500 IPC  Para from judgment, a lawyer is an advocate, one who speaks for another. Naturally beyond what […]

Continue Reading

Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha, (2011) 1 SCC 14

Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha, (2011) 1 SCC 14 Right To Maintenance Under Section 125 Of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 “Where partners lived together for a long spell as husband and wife, a presumption would arise in favour of valid wedlock” Facts of the case : The Sarju Singh Kushwaha had two sons, Ram […]

Continue Reading

Amit Rao Patil vs. state of Maharashtra bail application no. 1813 of 2020 Rape is just not a forcible intercourse, it means to inhabit and destroy everything, Bombay High Court

  Amit Rao Patil vs. state of Maharashtra bail application no. 1813 of 2020 Rape is just not a forcible intercourse, it means to inhabit and destroy everything, Bombay high court  “Consent induced by fiduciary relationship not a free consent”: Bail petition dismissed by the Bombay HC to rape accused business partner of victim’s father […]

Continue Reading
ASHOK KUMAR SHEORAN Vs UNION OF INDIA, Delhi High Court

ASHOK KUMAR SHEORAN Vs UNION OF INDIA, Delhi High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 323/2020 ASHOK KUMAR SHEORAN & ORS Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents W.P.(C) 323/2020 Summary: Court held that in a series of orders that those who had participated in the examination of 2003 would be covered by the OPS, notwithstanding that they had […]

Continue Reading